Why do anything? These sketches I do, why? Leaving that question as unknowable, the easier (easy is significant here) question is why do digital sketches?
1. Its easier to erase.
2. They don’t take time to dry.
3. They are easy to store.
4. Its easier to clean up after painting.
If that sounds silly, its not. That is why I’ve come back to digital after giving acrylics a good go. I love the real stuff, but I could not fit it into my life. And there is more:
5. They can be shared widely, easily.
6. They can be printed in different sizes.
7. They can be tweaked easily.
8. I can do them any time anywhere. In bed for example.
9. It is easy to change the background colour.
And here is the clincher:
10. All the reproductions are originals!
Travel & destination news:
Sir Mick Jagger’s lips bought by Victoria & Albert Museum
Updated: September 23 2008, 9:20 CET
Item follows:
(Continued)
Found this in my jumble. Bought back the memory of that trip to Sydney

Postage Stamps, Abstract Expressionism and Joan Mitchell:
The ten artists included in the stamp series are Hans Hoffman, Adolph Gottlieb, Mark Rothko, Arshile Gorky, Clyfford Still, Willem de Kooning, Barnett Newman, Jackson Pollock, Robert Motherwell and Joan Mitchell. Joan Mitchell (1925-1992) is the only woman in the group, though her contemporaries Elaine de Kooning, Helen Frankenthaler and Lee Krasner certainly could have found their way to abstract stamp glory as well. Joan Mitchell, however, is a great choice, a unique talent and appealing conversationalist as transcribed here in a 1986 interview with Linda Nochlin. Joan was born in Chicago, went East to Smith College and while there watched Rufino Tamayo paint a fresco in the art library; she returned to Chicago to study at the Art Institute, sojourned to New York then traveled to Mexico and Paris, Cuba and Haiti, then back to New York, though France would eventually become her home base.
Joan Mitchell – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia:
Joan Mitchell (February 12, 1925 – October 30, 1992) was a ‘Second Generation’ Abstract Expressionist painter. Along with Lee Krasner, Grace Hartigan, and Helen Frankenthaler she was one of her era’s few female painters to gain critical and public acclaim. Her paintings and editioned prints can be seen in major museums and collections across America and Europe.
Charlotte Park: Abstract Expresionist Paintings, 1950-63 – Hamptons.com:
Charlotte Park: Abstract Expresionist Paintings, 1950-63
By Exhibition May 25 – June 26, 2006
 |
|
Charlotte Park
Untitled, ca. 1951
Oil and gouache on muslin, 22 x 30 inches
Signed lower right: C. Park
|
Spanierman Gallery, LLC is pleased to present Charlotte Park: Abstract Expresionist Paintings, 1950-63. Curated by the noted art critic and scholar Ronny Cohen, this exhibition presents the most extensive survey of the Abstract Expressionist art of Park to date, featuring her paintings and drawings from the 1950s through the early 1960s. Many of the works have rarely or never been on view, providing new ways of considering the artist and her oeuvre. A brochure by Cohen discussing Park, her work, and her relationship within the context of the Abstract Expressionist movement accompanies the exhibition.
Park’s dynamic all-over style of composition, with its rich repertory of abstract shapes and bold imaginings, made its appearance in the early 1950s. From the beginning she put her own personal stamp on Abstract Expressionism, demonstrating through her art how profoundly well she understood the character of the movement and its means for reshaping reality and for discovering the essence of form and content. The irregular shapes appearing initially in Park’s works have as a general antecedent, the animated forms in the emergent Abstract Expressionist paintings of the late 1940s, such as those of Mark Rothko. Eventually Park evolved these shapes into a central feature of her painterly vocabulary, and the paintings in gouache that she created in the mid-1950s, in which references to nature on eastern Long Island appear, are revealing of the emblematic kinds of meaning with which she endowed her art. The wavy lines and twisty organic shapes in her works can be seen as the marks of a lively and commanding gestural hand, while the way that these forms sweep across the brilliant surfaces of a number of her gouaches of the mid-1950s can also be taken as the fascinatingly reductive signs of the ocean, bay, and countryside of Long Island.
I wrote a bit on my Psyberspace blog after I did the last three sketches. Here is a quote:
Tools evolve, and the best use of any given tool is of value. I have done a lot of sketching on my Palm PDAs – tool I’ll never use again – but therein lies something of value. The lead pencil has no colour. But look what has been done over the centuries with the humble pencil, and it lives. The current – no pressure iPad will die and be gone, but I look forward to making use of it, while it is in its first iteration. What can the finger do on that thing?
Here are some examples, some good stuff there.
#0926 Urban Rhythm
Larger Image.
This is sketch number 0926 in my Thousand Sketches project (2006-7) I stumbled upon it today on my Bio Page and I liked it a lot, (often I don’t like work years later, though at the time my latest is always my favourite) It’s has that calligraphic touch, it name suits: Urban Rhythm. I now include it in the current calligraphic series.
It is for sale on Felt, its been in several small exhibitions.

Saw the video today: The Man in the Hat. I loved it. Made the image with a snap from the TV screen. I think I like it because I have been to his gallery a few times. I’ve met Peter. I would love him to sell my prints!

I like this one, got into this today after listening to this interview:
Matthew Gale interviewed about Arshile Gorky on RNZ Nights
Wikipedia
Tate Modern| Current Exhibitions | Arshile Gorky:
“The most important figure in American Art before J.Pollock” – The Daily Telegraph.
Article follows. The link above also has a video – worth watching.
(Continued)
Two images made on the iphone using ToonPaint. But not only the ap of course. Various levels of sampeling going on here. They are are from photos I took from the TV screen, while I was watching a video about Alice Neel, Very impressive!


Monday, February 15, 2010
Calligraphy – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia:
Modern calligraphy ranges from functional hand-lettered inscriptions and designs to fine-art pieces where the abstract expression of the handwritten mark may or may not compromise the legibility of the letters (Mediavilla 1996).
New painting by Chagall. Just listened to the BBC program interview. Love these insights & stories.

Sunday, December 13, 2009
Prints of all my sketches, in this blog, in the Thousand Sketches and in the Gallery are for sale.
Dare I say it, there is just enough time left for Christmas if you buy now. In New Zealand you have a little longer.
Buy a Print
Sunday, November 29, 2009
This is an image of Edgar Degas.
Images
It began as a self portrait. Was captured in a movie and then I snapped it off the TV – made this using an iphone ap. But is it art? Anyway, I like it.
Larger Image
Tuesday, November 17, 2009

This is from “Where Grows the Bitter Herb” by Ben Powis
Saturday, November 14, 2009
Reading Robot Comics on the iPhone – a pleasure. Occasionally pages stand out as really exellent illustrations. I’ll send them along to the blog.

These are from Birth 1 by Michael S. Bracco, another follows.
(Continued)
Wednesday, November 4, 2009
Is it just me or is this lovely in it’s simplicity and ease of execution on the I Doodle app?

Signed one follows
(Continued)
Tuesday, November 3, 2009
The “sig” series I am doing, and there are a lot of them, are with a consciousness of the importance of identity and how the relationship with an avatar is reciprocal. Signing images I make is a work in process. I have signed some on the computer, but mostly I print them and sign and date them on the day of printing. I think of it as marking the making of the physical object.
More and more I want to sign them as I make them. One way or the other? Right now it could be anything! These Sig images, made on the iphone are printing well. I sign them again. Just WL and the date, in pencil.
But the alchemy of the avatar is still at work, and the change is not done. I amight be a bit old for this sort of adolescent exploration… but that is the way it is! As an artist I am young.
Science of Sex | The Digital Lover | Proteus Effect:
“Who we choose to be in turn shapes how we behave,” Yee writes in the draft paper. “While avatars are usually construed as something of our own choosing – a one-way process – the fact is that our avatars come to change who we are.”