Herbert Read, A Concise History of Modern Painting From Chapter 7 The Origin and Development of an art of Internal Necessityou: Abstract Expressionism. page 244 ff The belief that the facture or handwriting of the artist is an essential clue to his identity and quality had been the basis of the methodical criticism of the arts from the beginning of such criticism in the 'seventies of the nineteenth century (Morelli and Cavalcaselle). Fenellosa and other exponents of Oriental art had later drawn attention to the high aesthetic value assigned to calligraphy in China and Japan. The present appreciation of such artists as Sesshu (c. 1420-1506), with his 'flung-ink technique, no doubt has come about as a result of the discovery of similar techniques by modern artists; but the whole impact of Oriental art was such as to create an appreciation of the abstract qualities in works of art generally. The priority of Kandinsky's discovery of 'pure composition' is not in question, but Kandinsky approached the whole problem in a most cautious way. He realized that 'the emancipation from dependence on nature is just beginning': `If until now (i.e. 1910-12) colour and form were used as inner agents, it was mainly done subconsciously. The subordination of composition to geometrical form is no new idea (cf. the art of the Persians). Construction on a purely spiritual basis is a slow business, and at first seemingly blind and unmethodical. The artist must train not only his eye but also his soul, so that it can weigh colours in its own scale and thus become a determinant in artistic creation. If we begin at once to break the bonds that bind us to nature and to devote ourselves purely to combination of pure colour and indepen\pient form, we shall produce works that are mere geometric decoration, resembling something like a necktie or a carpet. Beauty of form and colour is no sufficient aim by itself, despite the assertions of pure aesthetes or even of naturalists obsessed with the idea of "beauty". It is because our painting is still at an elementary stage that we are so little able to be moved by wholly autonomous colour and form composition. The nerve vibrations are there (as we feel when confronted by applied art), but they get no farther than the nerves because the corresponding vibrations of the spirit which they call forth are weak'.19 If, in the next fifty years, these words of Kandinsky's had been remembered, there would have been much less confusion of thought and of practice. We are nowadays a little shy of using the word 'soul', or phrases like 'vibrations of the spirit', but it is not difficult to substitute the terminology of the psychology that has developed since 1912, and then we see that the point Kandinsky is making is obvious enough. It is not sufficient in an art of pure composition to appeal to sensation: the work of art must evoke a response at a deeper level, the level we now call unconscious; and the 'vibrations of the spirit' that then take place are either personal, in that they effect some kind of mental integration, or perhaps supra-personal, in that they assume the archetypal patterns into which mankind projects an explanation of its destiny. Implicit in these premonitions of Kandinsky is a distinction which was to separate his early experiments in pure composition from his later abstractions, and these later abstractions from the abstract expressionism that is our present concern. If one compares the Compositions of 1910-14 with the work Kandinsky did after his return from Russia in 1922, it might seem at first that he had succumbed to the 'mere geometric decoration' of whose superficiality he had been so fully aware in 1910. Kandinsky was always conscious of the mathematical basis of aesthetic form. `The final abstract expression of every art is number', he declared with emphasis in his book, and for this reason if no other he could not finally surrender himself to any form of automatism. The work of art must have a 'hidden construction', not an obvious geometrical construction, but nevertheless one with 'calculated' effects. He ended his treatise of 1912, as I have already pointed out, with the claim that we were approaching 'a time of reasoned and conscious composition, in which the painter will be proud to declare his work constructional' . The significance of the words I have emphasized is inescapable, and nothing in the future work of Kandinsky was to contradict them. A comparable theorist of the opposing school of abstraction has not yet arisen, though one may find psychological justifications of it," and the surrealist theories of 'automatism' were perhaps an inspiration to the movement. But here the distinction that has to be made is between the spontaneous projection of unconscious (more properly speaking, pre-conscious) imagery, and the recognition, in chance effects or spontaneous gestures, of forms that have an uncalculated and indeterminate significance. A graphologist will find a person's handwriting significant, and will generally prefer to look at it upside down in order not to be distracted from a contemplation of its form as distinct from its literal meaning. Abstract Expressionism, as a movement in art, is but an extension and elaboration of this calligraphic expressionism, and that is why it has a close relationship to the Oriental art of calligraphy. A direct influence of Oriental calligraphy is seen in the work of Henri Michaux, who travelled in the Far East in 1933,21 and has since become a somewhat esoteric master of calligraphic painting in Europe; and in the work of Mark Tobey (b. 1890) an American artist who visited the Far East in 1934, when he made a special study of Chinese calligraphy. Another American artist associated with Tobey who sometimes works in a calligraphic style (though never with an abstract intention) is Morris Graves (b. 1910). He too visited the Far East ( Japan) in 193o. The calligraphic style of these Pacific Coast artists penetrated to Europe and reinforced the `orientalism' of Michaux—the influence of Tobey in Paris has been profound. Nevertheless one must point out that even now Tobey is not strictly speaking an abstract expressionist—his art does not spring spontaneously from `inner necessity'. He is usually inspired by an external motif, an atmospheric effect of nature or of cities, and though the final picture surface (usually, as in Klee, of a miniature scale) may be completely non-objective in effect, in origin such an art is still analytical of nature rather than expressive of an inner necessity. Tobey has said: 'Ourground today is not so much the national or the regional ground as it is the understanding of this single earth. . . . Ours is a universal time and the significances of such a time allpoint to the need for the universalizing of the conscious- ness and the conscience of man. It is in the awareness of this that... American artist who visited the Far East in 1934, when he made a special study of Chinese calligraphy. Another American artist associated with Tobey who sometimes works in a calligraphic style (though never with an abstract intention) is Morris Graves (b. 1910). He too visited the Far East ( Japan) in 193o. The calligraphic style of these Pacific Coast artists penetrated to Europe and reinforced the `orientalism' of Michaux—the influence of Tobey in Paris has been profound. Nevertheless one must point out that even now Tobey is not strictly speaking an abstract expressionist—his art does not spring spontaneously from `inner necessity'. He is usually inspired by an external motif, an atmospheric effect of nature or of cities, and though the final picture surface (usually, as in Klee, of a miniature scale) may be completely non-objective in effect, in origin such an art is still analytical of nature rather than expressive of an inner necessity. Tobey has said: 'Ourground today is not so much the national or the regional ground as it is the understanding of this single earth. . . . Ours is a universal time and the significances of such a time allpoint to the need for the universalizing of the conscious- ness and the conscience of man. It is in the awareness of this that